Certified Clinical Research Associate (CCRA) Practice Exam 2025 – All-in-One Guide to Master Your Certification!

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

If an Investigator identifies an adverse event, what should they ensure happens next?

Dismiss the event as insignificant

Document it in the patient’s medical files

In clinical research, the identification and management of adverse events (AEs) are crucial for ensuring participant safety and the integrity of the study. When an investigator identifies an adverse event, documenting it in the patient’s medical files is critical for several reasons. This documentation serves as an official record of the event, which is essential for future reference, analysis, and regulatory compliance.

Recording the adverse event helps in tracking the safety profile of the intervention being studied and allows for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of patient outcomes. It also ensures that all stakeholders, including regulatory authorities, are informed about any potential risks associated with the study drug or procedure. This documentation might inform dose adjustments, safety communication to participants, or required changes to the study protocol.

In contrast, dismissing the event as insignificant is not consistent with regulatory oversight and ethical research practices, which demand a thorough evaluation of all AEs. Notifying the patient immediately could be appropriate in certain situations, especially if the event poses an immediate risk, but it is not a generalized requirement; therefore, it may not always be the next action taken. Ceasing the clinical trial is an extreme measure and is generally determined based on a comprehensive assessment of the adverse event and its implications for the study as a whole. Thus,

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Notify the patient immediately

Cease the clinical trial

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy